Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: spy hard who wrote (2309)	6/2/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (2) of 4142

Spy, could you expound on your theory? The worst case scenario <as I understand it> is the warrants that are not converted get recalled and become worthless as for trading purposes. The person who buys without converting them looses a bit of money. But while they held them the warrants served much like insurance so to speak. However, if the buyer chose to pay the cost of conversion they would have a share of common. The warrant carries an option to convert, sell or forfeit. Is it possible that it was more profitable to sell the warrants and purchase the preferred? It sounds like it may have been? The warrants do bring additional money to the company and the short traders may continue to use them against the long term investors but in the end I don't see it making a difference in the price. JMO If I am wrong and am not seeing this clearly I want someone to clarify it. IF Arcon calls in the warrants those just become worthless; don't they? I am not totally clear on this point myself. Dusty :o)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next