SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: shane forbes who wrote (12759)6/2/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) of 25814
 
Shane, I agree that an earnings warning out of Intel would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. About the delay in Merced, FWIW, an Intel spokesman finally came out because he didn't like the way some of the speculation was going. Naturally, he saw it my way, gg, (actually, I believed CEO Barrett, but a lot of Intellites didn't):

To: rich evans (56626 )
From: John Hull
Tuesday, Jun 2 1998 11:00AM ET
Reply # of 56717

Rich, this theory is going down the wrong path. Craig Barrett is
correct and Tony V. and Paul E. both touch on simialr themes of
process complexity, program management and interdependencies.
Stay on that course.

Manufacturing/Production is not an issue. Architecture is not an
issue.

Let's all be rational on this subject, there's nothing here that
belongs in a good suspense novel. Its not easy work, but Intel will
get it done.

Regards,
jh

Again, FWIW, a scheduling problem is better news than an architectural, or technology or manufacturing problem.

Is LSI poised for another leg up on it's sawtooth waveform chart?

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext