Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 156.37

-1.9%

11:51 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gregg Powers who wrote (11023)	6/2/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: DaveMG	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Gregg, I find this a might confusing. If ERICY is claiming patent infringment by IS95, why is QCOM the lone defendant, or am I mistaken about this?Also, I'm not certain that one can infer that the only reason there is any standards "debate" is because of QC IPR. CDMAone represents a lot of vested interests at this point in addition to QC. If ERICY were to ram wCDMA down the Euro's throats, it wouldn't necessarily become a universal standard. On the other hand, the tone of the public press releases seem to reflect your point of view....That's very interesting what you're saying about the court case. I had been thinking that this wass the only serious issue other than manufacturing problems which might stand in the Q's way..Dave

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next