amc thank you for your comment:
<<After looking at the price history of vvus i can certainly
understand your hostility toward Pfizer but i also believe there
is a sucker born every minute. Please keep buying vvus to prove
my later point! >>.
From reviewing your profile's only other post
Message 2586810
<<<< To: +James O'Brien (11 )
From: +amc
Reply #12
Wednesday, Oct 29 1997 5:21PM ET
Are you the same people who demanded lower commissions because you didn't need a full service company to hold your hands? >>>
I will assume you are a broker. Statistically only one in twenty brokers knows his job, chuckle chuckle.
I have difficulty placing you, with only one sample for analysis, in the correct camp.; however judging by the lack of any ( medical ) data or any other data in your post, which is thus reduced to pure opinion, I think we can safely assume that you are an average guy, ie belonging to the majority of 19.
While you are giving us your unadulterated opinion, I would also appreciate knowing from you, at what point in time should I get really hostile with Pfizer: i.e., how many cardiovascular deaths and how many blind people do you think is a reasonable price/earnings ratio for this stock,
TA
PS As a friendly gesture, I will help you keep tab. So far we've had 5 documented deaths. Here are 2 more
Message 4710596
No blind people ( yet ).
By the way are you one of those brokers described in the above URL ?
"Investors and analysts have not been overly concerned about deaths on Viagra and expect that the media will make a bigger deal about them than is warranted ".
One mor question: are any of your Urologists advisers part of this other group, in the same URL
" Certainly, here at the American Urological Association meeting, Viagra fervor has been undiminished amid the occasional reports of deaths and ocular side effects ".
Don't get hot now, I am just asking .
|
