Gee! step away for a couple hours another 50 posts.
To all in question about the epa verification. 1st
I also have in hard copy from SGS their test results,
I also have the application in hard copy sent to epa
registering the product with John Spriggs/Arcons name
all over it. Spanning 05-97 to 02-98. I have spoken
to many at the EPA with regards to DF-144 , At least
4 individuals, My notes have their names and #'s,
presently buried(I thought computers were supposed
to eliminate paper??????) Oh! back to my point, Now
when 1st digging around, Gary you might remember when
I was raising and issue on this , you and I had a
conference call with John Spriggs, and raised all these
questions, Anyhow , It's a little convoluted( Again
many more names and #'s) cause the patents,inventors ,
companies that owned the rights finally to rest with
Arcon, pre-registration of the original inventor ,
and not to mention it takes time for all the paperwork
to get to all those govt. dept's. Also there is a
clause regarding the sale of product which allows to
simplyfy paper work in the early stages of Start up
companies for sale less than 50 million dollars in
sales that has a progressive registering process.
The Bottom line is this,The product was sold prior to
Arcon buying it out, It had to be registered to do
that. There changing the mfg. plants not the original
product. We do know that improving the product
because of the new patents, obviously they will adjust
the paperwork to epa accordingly. Sorry for Rambling.
Best Regards
WB |
