SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 174.10+1.1%2:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JMD who wrote (11065)6/4/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: A.J. Mullen  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Sprint ION or Fastbreak: my question comes from the opposite direction. Mike, you asked whether the local phone companies could be bypassed by going wireless. My question is: why can't CDMA be used to make more efficient use of whatever medium is used, viz. copper or fibre?

CDMA is a practical method to approach the theoretical maximum information content within any given signal. As far as I know there is nothing special about wireless. Surely CDMA (and to a lessor extent, TDMA) would allow a greater flow rate of information.

When you think about, it's crazy to have a dedicated piece of wire from your telephone that does nothing most of the time. Even when you're using the telephone, a processor could compress the speech to occupy the line for just a tiny fraction of the time you are conversing (TDMA), or interweave your voice with other signals (CDMA).

Why aren't cable companies using CDMA? There is (or was) a company (Pairgain?) that was developping a method of boosting the bandwidth of boring old copper wires. Does/did this use CDMA?

AJ
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext