Peter & Glenn Z,
I, too, would like to thank you for maintaining dignity and sticking it out with your equitable input. I will strive to be brief now in reflecting my position/concerns to all esteemed members on the thread, and ProNetLink also. I am long and settled in, observing.
As posted previously, responsiveness and willingness to change as needed paramount in growth phases. Following IMO = prioritized need (please understand I know the BIG picture & all details not available to this viewer, but from all I can see.....)
Such a big job being done, & congrats so far. Concerns as follows:
1) Search capability / functionality paramount. If Europe uses different organizational rationale, multiple key searches may be logical since audience is international. The simplest, most broadly understandable and powerful search rationale must be available as a basis of immediate usage for all interested subscribers. first impressions important + no need for rework, i.e., most productive.
2) I see no need for PR based on stock prices. This has been adequately covered by others. IMO, best reasons being prices are independent of value until the market pushes to limits irresistable by price setters. Outstanding shorts may need to have prices low for awhile to try to recoup losses. Hold & let it pass. My certs are being delivered.
3) Strategic alliances are paramount to long term for this business. ProNet is doing a wonderful job & must continue certainly. Now that the site is functioning, this must be weighted with core functionality though. Tough job. I have faith in the crew though.
Beyond this I can only wish the best to all. |
