Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 181.30

-0.5%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gregg Powers who wrote (11140)	6/4/1998 8:27:00 PM
From: DaveMG	Read Replies (3) of 152472

Gregg, I'm wondering whether you've seen any independent data on this chip rate issue. For those of us not in the know we're stuck with "he said, she said",although I personally find Dr. Viterbi far more credible than ERICY.Also this statement in Maurice's post from the Yahoo board this morning about the core architectures of IS95 and IS136 was somewhat perplexing, as if to imply that there really is no compatibility problem. Sounds like talkin out of both sides of ones mouth. I agree with you that Tero's jabs seem rather jingoistic and am curious to what extent you think this continental rivalry is actually influencing events.I don't think one should underestimate the lengths to which people will go to "prove themselves", and how ERICY might be turning this to their advantage. Do you hink QC and the CDG are viewed by everyone else as "The Americans"?. Once again, I really appreciate all the time you're devoting to this thread, although I assume we're not the only ones learning... Dave

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next