Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)

AENG 0.0001000

0.0%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PHG who wrote (523)	6/4/1998 11:29:00 PM
From: cornbread	Read Replies (1) of 3383

I have been reading this thread since AENG was trading at 5-1/8. While the discussions are informative and entertaining, I would like to change the focus back on the engine. I feel that one major point of the OX2 has been neglected in this thread. The point being Production Cost. Having 20 plus years in manufacturing / machine tool / automotive I know what it takes to produce a conventional engine. We can debate the performance of the engine all we want , but the simple truth is that this engine has dramatically reduced the number of components, moving and non moving. Fewer parts = reduced production cost = reduced machining processes = reduced handling = reduced assembly = huge cost savings for companies that employ the OX2 technology. It is my opinion that the cost to produce the OX2 will be a small fraction of the cost of producing a conventional engine. It only makes sense that, once the engine is proven (& that is just a matter of time), companies will want to use this technology because it is PROFITABLE to do so. Let me reiterate, the production cost savings are enough in them self to make the OX2 a commercial success. Any favorable performance reports will be like throwing gasoline on a fire. Some of the previous postings have expressed concerns regarding lubrication and wear. I do not see lubrication and wear as problems . It is easy to use induction heating, to surface harden those components that are in contact with each other. The surface areas in a CVJ ( constant velocity joint / drive shaft ) are hardened using this technique. The technology is out there to produce a viable, reliable and cost effective motor. I know that Japanese auto-makers are investing time and money to reduce the number of components used in their conventional engines for the reasons mentioned above. Hopefully, American manufactures will beat Japan to the punch !!! Given the recent nature of this thread I feel like I should be insulting someone. No closing insults just "Live long and prosper"!!!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next