SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Infinity Financial Technology

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stuart Scolnik who wrote (2)11/21/1996 11:49:00 PM
From: Blake Cmajdalka   of 11
 
I am with your Competition; C*ATS shareholder I mean
The competition for INFN is mainly Sungard and C*ATS. Sungard is a very big and mighty competitor and C*ATS and Infinity are in the same range. INFN has more sales though do to their selling agreement with IBM. IBM's sales made up 43% of their most recent license revenue. The big question is who will have the best risk management software. Sungard has Panarama which I believe is out already, INFN has Riskview which they are expecting to release soon and C*ATS has CARMA which has I believe has 5 clients so far. C*ATS most upgraded CARMA version is going to be released in Dec 96. I see that the underwriters finally rated INFN a "BUY" yesterday (WHOOPIE). That is pretty standard business. It seems to me that INFN is pretty richly valued on a PE basis. I will be curious to see what happens when the underwriters quit supporting the stock, which is pretty normal for an IPO. I hope
we all make money on our picks. There is enough business to go around for all of us right now. Anybody know why C*ATS has twice the number of clients and half the revenue INFN has. Is C*ATS's software more expensive or does INFN have bigger clients. Did you know that the leaders of INFN used to work at C*ATS. Talk to you later
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext