Son of SAN - Storage Networking Technologies Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Son of SAN - Storage Networking Technologies

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neil S who wrote (609)	6/6/1998 9:09:00 AM
From: Neil S	Read Replies (1) of 4808

It's FC all the way per Brocade Solutioneer techweb.com <<Various industry perceptions persist that current technologies can act as alternatives to a Fibre Channel-based SAN. However, this is not true. Gigabit Ethernet does not have direct storage interfaces; nor can it guarantee in-order delivery of frames at a network protocol level, which SANs require. OC-12 asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) has no direct storage interfaces. It also has a higher overhead-5 bytes out of every 53-byte frame, vs. Fibre Channel's 36 bytes out of every 2,112 bytes of payload-that is not at all suited to the large file transfers required in a SAN. Current Ultra SCSI-2 environments do not have the performance or the fault resilience necessary to provide the functional characteristics of a SAN. >> Neil

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next