SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.03-1.3%Dec 1 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (57509)6/8/1998 2:31:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Paul -
All good points on the IA32 line. The reality is that almost all of the server applications of any size can be accomplished by that architecture now.

I think the real issue is development of a reliable 64 bit architecture for the back end and middle tier of tomorrow's apps, not today's needs. 32 bit architectures will continue to have problems with large memory addressing - not insurmountable but a long way from seamless. As you point out, Intel had the 64 bit mindshare up until recently. I think they need to do more than just drive IA32 if they want to maintain that momentum over the next 3 years.

My sense is that a unified 64 bit architectural effort among the big players, rather than a Merced or Alpha tussle, will do the most to advance industry acceptance of these platforms.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext