Jonathan, You've got your facts mixed up. Ira was at FAMH when it started its decline. Ira made statements that hurt the company and its shareholders. In addition, he made decisions that did the same thing. Yes, FAMH hit the high 60's under Ira, but, the rise was based on hype by Ira, nothing more. In order for FAMH or any other stock to increase in value the facts must be supported by numbers. In the case of FAMH under Ira, this was not done. Just hype, nothing more.
Now Jonathan, (may I call you john?) okay, Now John, you need to do a little work on YOUR credibility. Coming on this thread and hyping Ira will get you no where. If I were you, I'd let the Ira issue rest. I'm sitting here more than 7K in the hole. You and Mackie can both kiss my a@@.
Best wishes,
Lonnie |
