SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDTI - an IC Play on Growth Markets
IDTI 48.990.0%Mar 29 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rob S. who wrote (8813)6/9/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Charlie Tuna  Read Replies (2) of 11555
 
I would not dedicate the oregon fab to x86 mfg.
I would not put all of my eggs in 1 x86 basket.
There are other ops that are being missed.
Let IBM make the WCII and if things work out
really well then move the oregon fab into
making the x86 parts...this lowers the overall
risk to idt...They were able to get the winchip
developed for peanuts and this was great but
now they are spending a ton to mfg it and my
guess is that it is no longer worth risking
so much on but could still be a very good
money maker....so let us say that glen hits
a home run and the wc2's are selling like
hot cakes and ibm is making all of em for
idt...so what they make a few less bucks
but can allways convert the oregon fab
into doing x86...now let us look at the
other scenario...the wc2 is to little to
late and idt has spent all of its oregon mfg
resources into building it OUCH OUCH OUCH.
This is not rocket science ... try and get
the most profit for the least risk ...min/max
ok.Sorry if i sound pissed but i hate to see
them take such a big risk when they do not need
to....one last time........THE REAL VALUE OF THE
WC2 IS CPU DESIGN/IP NOT THE MFG OF THE CPU.
Charlie
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext