If you give DF names, dates, numbers he will then assert you have made it all up.
No, actually, if he could do this, it would be easily verifiable. That's why he doesn't. According to the FEC there are three PACS registered that are relevant to this discusion: Lockheed Employee's PAC, Lockheed Martin Employee's PAC and Hughes Electronics Corp. Active Citizenship Fund (Registration codes: C00030783, C00303024, C00002162 respectively)
None of these PACs gave to either the Clinton nor Dole campaigns in the 1995-1996 reporting season. You can check the records yourself at: ftp://ftp.fec.gov/FEC/itpas2.zip (2.9 megabytes)
Therefore, Lockheed Martin, which was not a donor in the 96 presidential election, is an example of a company that recently got a waiver and launched from China. That proves my point that there are companies that did not donate in the presidential election that got waivers.
It also bears noting that Motorola, which does not have a PAC registered, got waivers too. So, that makes three companies.
Dragonfly |
