| REPOST:HEADER: ICVI investors must read: Comments by Tim.P, a non-SI ME DD memeber and lurker and strong believer. Thanx Tim.
 
 I'm still holding 5K for the long-term, but I feel like I'm in
 uncharted waters since I'm relatively new to internet-influenced BB
 stocks.
 
 For what it's worth, here's my two cents on current events:
 
 1) The Press Release:
 
 a) Leaks of it's release fueled folk's hopes - when it was relatively
 minor - it was a letdown and day-traders bailed with MMs moving in for
 a kill;
 
 b) People need to understand that the acquisition of 8,000 acres may
 amount to nothing. A likely scenario is that the previous land owner
 entered this deal under the condition that they would get a percentage
 of whatever ME found and extracted. Therefore, if the land is
 worthless - they get nothing - if ME does find huge reserves - they'll
 strike it rich too. ME folks would not buy land with unproven
 mineral/ff reserves (unless it was significantly dirt-cheap and did
 not effect the bottom-line) and the previous owners would not allow
 themselves to be "hoodwinked".
 
 2) I think a percentage of the people posting on the SI board need to
 improve the quality of their messages. Maybe I have no right to point
 this out since I'm only a reader, but still, I consider you and most
 of other folks investment associates, kindred spirits and friends.
 Most likely, the current negativity is short-term - but it's still not
 in our best-interest. This is a widely-read board, therefore, alot of
 current and potential investors are using it as a gauge in determining
 the health of ME. If I had just starting reading the board four days
 ago, I would have not read further, let alone invested in ME.
 
 Again, for what it's worth, opinions challenging the prospects of ME
 should be addressed respectfully and with clear and articulate logic
 based on a opinion supported by analysis, that in turn is based on
 solid data. In this case, ME speaks for itself. For the
 emotionally-handicapped posters that keep harassing the board - folks
 should just ignore them. Being ignored will drive'em mad and turn
 them into a desperate comedy act (an unintended one !). After
 everyone has had plenty of laughs they'll eventually go away
 frustrated.
 
 3) Other reasons for the stock price drop:
 
 a) I think in this case it's unwise, but can you really blame folks
 who got in around .15 for bailing at .7 ? It's a natural upward
 spiral in this case - folks buy at .15, then bail at .8 and then
 others buy at 0.5, hoping to bail at 2 or 3. Everybody wants to lock
 in their profits, regardless if more patience could reward them
 10-fold more;
 
 b) MM boys;
 
 c) ME management wants a shake-out to increase the number of long-term
 holders. Their company is in it's infancy - a delicate time period.
 The stock getting jerked around by whoever could cause some serious PR
 problems and potentially hinder future growth. Plus, they want to
 control and direct and not cede it to some MMs who don't share their
 goals;
 
 4) Long-term outlook: for the reasons I stated in previous emails to
 you, I still firmly believe this company is going to be very
 successful. Nothing has changed - except for the fact that fossil
 fuels are going up in price. This month I'm going to try to contact
 Jack U. (if he can spare the time). I'll email anything worthwhile.
 
 Well, I apologize if I rambled or offended anyone. Hope to hear from
 you soon.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Tim
 |