Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Martin E. Frankel who wrote (8784)	6/10/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (4) of 10836

Based on a discussion with Richard Marshall. 1. The Bloomberg report is wrong. The decision is not imminent. This was retracted. 2. Atkinson is also guessing, the Saturday expiry of 250,000 3.25 warrants will not affect the market. 3. The Canadian Banks DID cut all margin on KRY last week due to the FP article detailing the money spent by Crystallex on the court case. 4.The Supreme court is in session now. They have stopped hearing all briefs and submissions. They have reached a decision. They have said they will issue it soon. I would GUESS it will be sometime in July. If not it will be sometime in late September. 5. The MEM was erroneous when it averred that Dot de Lemon had revoked her power of attorney to her lawyers to dispose of the claims LC 4 and 6. It was never revoked by law. No legal document states otherwise. 6. Based on the above and the weak summer market and the low price of gold and a possible Asensio attack (he is involved in dropping another stock right now), I would buy more Crystallex, especially on any weakness. echarter@vianet.on.ca The Canadian Mining Newsletter

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next