SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (28931)6/10/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: Joseph G.  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Mike, not going much into historic details, I just note that 1. situation is now not the same as in 1933, and 2. looking at old charts gold-eagle.com (you have to scroll down) of HM vs DJIA, I notice there was no big uptick in HM till a year and a half after the crash (I won't say derogatory things about masses -g-, but note a similarity to the present 1 1/2 year delayed reaction to fundamentals in, e.g., semiconductor industry); and, actually, HM went down during the crash. I can only assume that now, when index funds and closet indexers start to sell down SPX, it's gold mining components will get sold too. Thus, my plan -g- is to buy some when they sell.

PS. It is not obvious to me that gold at $300 is cheap by historical standards, and I have not noticed much mines closures yet. US$ has gone up, but in Y or DM gold is even less cheap.
Platinum, palladium, silver have more industrial demand, though I don't know if it's likely to increase or decrease in near future.

PPS. Have you noticed my spelling is better? -g-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext