International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bruce McGaughey who wrote (550)	11/24/1996 11:17:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	of 35569

Bruce: I do not want to belabor this issue, particularly in view of IPMCF's own choice not address it right now. But we are only assuming that the :rock" is the mother lode, and mother lodes are rarely within or very close to the erosional deposits from such "source rock", so we must refrain of speculating on this issue until we know more. As far as I am concerned, there could be a vast reserve in this rock and it could even be the source rock for deposits some 40 miles away (much more rational then the source rock for deposits less than a mile away), but we do not even have a single analysis on this rock, so why bother? Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next