SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI
CCSI 21.89-0.4%12:23 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TokyoMex who wrote (2921)6/11/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) of 5736
 
Hey Tokyo, I just can't stand the pathetic attempts the longs have made to discredit Asensio. Other threads have done such better work, and come up with far more damaging fact. The KRY longs were really tenacious on that point. It's really too bad they didn't research KRY quite as thoroughly as they did Asensio. So I went to the KRY thread and dug up what's below. I figure the longs need another distraction, and heck, wouldn't want anyone to think I was hiding anything. Besides, sooner or later it would surface, and I'm tired of waiting. Maybe this will help your squeeze in the morning. I'd like to add a few more shares short at a higher price myself. Oh, BTW, check out what happened to KRY today. Asensio said it was worthless, and now, it looks like the end. CCSI longs should visit that thread if they want to see their future. But I'm sure they'd rather be distracted by the 1989 judgement.

Barb
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Norman Murphy, Plaintiff
vs.

Steinberg & Lymas, etc.,
Defendants

FINAL JUDGEMENT

FINDINGS OF FACT
__________________________________________________

This case was tried to a jury on March 27 1989, and testimony was presented by both
the Plaintiff, Norman Murphy, and Robert Kilbride.

This court, having heard and considered the testimony, including but not limited to
Robert Kilbride's statement that the Defendant admitted the willful and intentional acts
of the Defendants resulted in the Plaintiff's loss, this Court specifically finds that the
claimant has demonstrated to the Court by clear and convincing evidence that the
award is not excessive in light of the facts and circumstances which were presented to
the trier of fact.

THEREFORE, pursuant to the verdict rendered in this action on March 27, 1989, it is
hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, NORMAN E. MURPHY, recover from
Defendant, MANUEL P. ASENCIO, the sum of Forty Eight Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($48,250.00) in compensatory damages and the sum of Two Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) in punative damages for FRAUD and DECEIT, the
total judgement being fo the sum of Two Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty ($248,250.00), that shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) a year,
for which let execution issue.

DONE AND ORDERED at Stuart, Martin County, Florida, this 3rd day of April,
1989.

John Fennelly, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext