SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEXI: Mostly Fact, A Little Fiction, Not Vicious Attacks
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stanley L Brown who wrote (7816)11/24/1996 10:51:00 PM
From: Wasef Kassis   of 13351
 
Stan,

I have just gone through my worthless archives of the SGA Newsletter. I found the one in question and it was dated 6/20/96; One day after the 6/19/96 post on SI. This is the one that was done verbatim to the SI post. As I remeber, this same person was also quoted in another SGA newsletter issue but I can't recall the date and content.

Anyway, SGA stated on their 6/20/96 newsletter that "We thought you may be very interested in the following e-mail which was sent by a ----- -----, a subscriber from Chicago Illinois. The e-mail is as follows:...". And then they go on to quote the e-mail. They did not mention that they knew or trusted that person.

Now, on the 6/6/96 SGA Newsletter, they did write about two other eyewitness accounts at the AFCEA/TechNet show. They said, "The first individual is one who we trust very much...". This is NOT the same person who they quoted on the 6/20/96 newsletter because this same SI poster disagreed with some of what was said on the 6/6/96 newsletter. You will see this on the 6/7/96 post on SI.

You will also notice that SGA provided a name in the 6/20/96 release but not the names of the persons in the fluffed 6/6/96 newsletter; One of which they said to have trusted very much. Because of this, I beleive that the 6/6/96 newsletter is less credible than the 6/20/96 newsletter.

I knew that these SGA Newletters would come in handy for something other than lighting the fireplace.

= WA$EF =
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News