SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Confluence who wrote (1544)	6/12/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: GULL	Read Replies (1) of 7235

Does the truth hurt, even if it is only a letter to the editor? The Mail & Guardian is one the few papers that gives the equal opportunity right to reply unlike most papers quoted on this thread.So it is no wonder that the two other interested parties chose to reply, forget about all these conspiracy theories! Has it ever occurred to you that maybe the heirs would rather deal with De Beers not only because of the reputation of the company, but also as a result of the shoddy treatment accorded them by SUF? IMHO they would rather wait a little longer while DB do their DD.I am sure that time constraints must have been included in their agreement, so the heirs will not wait forever as indicated by a lot of postings.I am sure that SUF would also do DD if they were paying out R75M. As long as the Section 24 is pending, and the Minister has indicated his wish for a negotiated settlement, then all the interested parties will carry on negotiating.No mystery there either.The only thing that DB can lose in these protracted negotiations is time and possibly patience. P.S.I wonder what diamonds would be worth if De Beers just adopted SUF's approach and marketed them all immediately?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next