Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.56

+10.2%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dmf who wrote (57844)	6/12/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (3) of 186894

dmf - Re: " Please share information on Windows 95, OSR2 and whether or not you are resisting Win98. " I have found Windows 95, OSR2, [Ver. 4.00.950.B] to be quite a bit more stable than Win 3.1 . Whereas I would generally have a major system fault once or twice weekly with Win 3.1, Windows 95 generally runs at least a week - or sometimes two - between problems. Moreover, with WIndows 95, you can generally "END" a task that crashes without having to re-boot the system. The file system - with >8 Gig Hard drive capability - is a real treat, as is the long file name capability (always part of WIn 95). As for Windows 98 - yes, I plan to upgrade to it after it has been out on the market 6 months or so. I'm not fond of Internet Explorer but I have seen reports that Netscape Communicator (my choice) runs just fine on Windows 98. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next