International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (581)	11/25/1996 11:50:00 AM
From: David Regep	of 35569

Zeev, I read your doubts about IPMCF and understand them. I think Rothschild and a few others are questioning your motives for a couplw of reasons. One is that you are so very bullish with GPGI but so skeptical with IPMCF. The questions you raise with IPMCF are as pertinent to GPGI if not more so since they do not have any reserves even if they get paid for their sludge. As Ron, CL, and myself have stated in the past, IPM is going forward and attempting to prove reserves while still solving the extraction dilemma. That would put two very tall hurdles behind them. Unfortunatley, this is probably a 26 mile hurdle race for all companies involved. I think CL got upset since so many people question IPMC's motives and direction with so few facts or backwards truths. CL is convinced that IPM has the goods. To hear the same garbage over and over is very frustrating. I am sure you would agree from your experience on the GPGI thread. Back to the reason people are questioning you is why are you so bullish on GPGI and not on IPMCF? You have answered that in the past but whenever I read the reasons, I ask "so why doesn't that pertain to GPGI as much?" Regards, DR

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next