LORAL -- Political Discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dragonfly who wrote (507)	6/12/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) of 880

Hey DF. I don't think so. Bill asked you if you could prove that a non-donor got a waiver a la Schwarz at Loral. You made an irrelevant post about PACs. But how about the real issue? Can you prove that a non-donor (a la Schwarz @ Loral) got a waiver? I haven't seen any proof. Now if you read this post several times and use your English to Moron dictionary to translate, you will see that the ball is still in your court. Prove it. You asserted that non-donor outfits like Hughes etc. got waivers. Can you or can you not prove that the muckity mucks at those companies did NOT donate to Clinton like Schwarz @ Loral? If you can, post your proof. Otherwise, give up and go home. You have become redundant and tiresome. JLA

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next