SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 322.34+1.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (20331)6/14/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: Fortinwit  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
He sees 1998 at $1.24 and 1999 at $1.00 eps down from $1.85. Yes, I believe he may well be the first analyst to go one record that 1999 will be worse than 1998 for AMAT. Sure would like to hear his reasoning behind that idea.

JW:

What we've seen so far is the consequence of the effects of massive oversupply in the semi world. I believe that Deahna is now looking at the other shoe falling, i.e. demand. Remove demand for chips (Asian recession, or worse) from the oversupply we're seeing (now predicted to run into Mid-99) and $1 for 99 isn't out of order.

On another note, it seems to me that far, far too many people just went bullish on this stock (and other semi-equips) because of sudden perceived 'value' due to the price drop. To paraphrase the kid, the only economic factor that has changed for the better is that the price has gone from $39 to $28. And as JJCramer would say, just because the price has dropped a lot, doesn't mean it cannot fall further (read the DDs, the oils, and COMS threads). I'll be looking to short the weak sisters on any bounces...

F.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext