Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 168.09

+1.8%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dave who wrote (11489)	6/15/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: CDMQ	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Dave, I agree that patents are indeed intellectual property in a literary sense, but, in a legal sense, not all intellectual property is patented. I think there is a spectrum with considerable grey area in between. I'm concerned that if the Q had CDMA completely locked up in all respects, ERICY would not even be trying. These guys may have been born at night but not last night! The Q has shown the international community that it will not be run over. One of my initial concerns involving a relatively new, small cap company, was it could not afford to fight an extended legal battle with the likes of MOT or ERICY. I'm sure we all sense these guys would like to find some way to neutralize the Q, even if it is a buy out or some form of predatory pricing. They are certainly pursuing the political avenues. John Major apparently feels that patents alone are not enough protection. Any illumination would be appreciated.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next