You have to wonder why the semi-equip sector is recovering so strongly. My bet is that it's just a trading rally, no more. Most of these stocks are not fundamentally oversold. Here is some more dismal news about the industry, in this case another 300mm push back:
Changes in I300I charter possible
A service of Semiconductor Business News, CMP Media Inc. Story updated at 9:30 a.m. EDT/6:30 a.m. PDT, 6/16/98 By J. Robert Lineback
SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Sematech's U.S. and international member companies have asked the consortium's International 300-mm Initiative (I300I) to draft a 1999 operating plan and budget with the goal of extending the project another year, according to Frank Robertson, director of I300I. Austin, Tex.-based Sematech is expected to set I300I's charter in July, said Robertson, who was here this week to speak before the Third Annual 300-mm Symposium hosted by Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI).
It remains unclear whether I300I will continue dedicating most of its efforts to evaluating new 300-mm production equipment or if the project will be refocused on other tasks, such as tool improvement, Robertson said.
Because of a lack of 300-mm prototype systems, I300I has only evaluated half of the tool sets needed to fabricate wafers, Robertson said. The lack of tools and new delays in 300-mm pilot line projects appears to be stalling the movement to 12-inch wafers (see June 15 story). Sematech has defined 38 sets of tools needed to produce wafers. Those systems are used to perform between 300 to 500 process steps in chip-processing plants. Sematech's chip-making member companies have set a goal of having a full set of 300-mm tools available by the second quarter 1999, but equipment makers are now pushing back their plans to make available prototypes to I300I for evaluation, Robertson said. He warned tool suppliers that I300I may not be able to complete evaluations if systems are not delivered to the program this year.
In Japan, I300I's counterpart, Selete, is also facing the same experience in delays in prototype tool availability, according to Robertson. |