I shall choose my words with careful consideration.
"rharris", you are to be commended and applauded and thanked for having taken the time and, I'm sure, expense to have transcribed your interview with Mr. Tilton.
A transcript is, however, just that: a transcript, a verbatim record of what was said, when, and by whom. ["whittled down"] implies that parts are now missing. That the Company saw fit to edit - yes, let's use the word "edit" because that is what has been done and what has now happened - means that we will not not derive the complete benefit of knowing what was said, when, and by whom.
This leaves the entire effort now an exercise in futility and, thus, useless. And aside from the contempt shown toward us, the shareholders, the owners of the Company it is an insult to you, "rharris" for deeming your time and effort inconsequential. I believe you are owed an immediate apology by Mr. Tilton.
My first question, therefore, is "Mr. Tilton, what did you edit, and why?" My second question is "Mr. Tilton, what do you seek to hide from us, your shareholders, the owners of the Company?" And my third question is "Mr. Tilton, may we have your resignation, please?" |
