SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 220.66+1.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oeconomicus who wrote (6212)6/16/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: Tom D  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
<<<would 20% really impress anyone?>>

You are right Bob. This is a departure from previous quarters in which AMZN blew away the "official" revenue expectations. Here I am projecting that, yes, they might actually meet expectations. But the difference, IMHO, is that now there is real competition from BKS. I am not fervently trying to tell everybody to buy this stock with my recent postings.

I am trying to solicit opinions about where the price will go from here, and what might be the determining factors. I have no confidence in my ability to figure where we go from here.

I don't know how the street would react to a 20% increase in revenues. I guess it would depend on how fast BKS is growing revenues. It appears that the street believes that AMZN grew revenues at a faster rate than BKS in Q1, and that AMZN is winning the competition or already won. But, I don't think BKS was trying very hard in Q1, in terms of promoting their website.

Another unknown is how much of the decline in RK website visits was due to small booksellers using BKS search engine instead of AMZN's search engine to locate books for customers who didn't know the correct title of the books they wanted. And, how many visits are actually shopping agents reporting to netsurfers that AMZN was not the cheapest.

Best Regards,
Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext