SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)
AENG 0.00010000.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RAY BARBER who wrote (812)6/16/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) of 3383
 
Ray: Take a look at the IBUY thread. This activity is strikingly similar to what TRAV is up to. See the Millberg Weiss Class Action Lawsuit against Waldron/Wedbush/IBUY. Item 3: Wedbush used illegal above market buy-ins to dissuade short sellers from their normal course of business" Call Millberg Weiss in San Diego. Or, perhaps the fellow "Arcane Lore" on SI can track it down. See other lawsuits for the same company for even more similarities. Have a lawyer explain the patent situation to you, I have given you all too much information for you not to understand. TRAV has gone in writing on nothing, neither has AENG: no research reports, no financials.

See IBUY regarding the SEC market manipulation and resulting trading halt. Ray, I am trying to be patient, of course I am a doubting Thomas, but I am laying sufficient evidence in front of your nose. Just because TRAV recorded the calls does not mean he did something legal. Again, this type of behavior is unnecessary in a legitimate stock. There are also some things here that TRAV has done that have been alluded to here and they are serious allegations. He knows what he did on Friday, how he reversed it yesterday and what he did today. If the heat wasn't on why did he do today's buy in at the legal price (within the days-trading range) of 18 & 1/2 instead of 21? (10,500 shares)

Note that on Friday the stock closed at 17 & 1/16 and the buy ins occurred at 21. Why, if he was allowed to do them at 21 when the stock is at 17 &1/16, would he do the buyin at 18 &1/2 today when he "could" have done it at 21? Think about it, before you listen to TRAV's lies. He has been exposed and the heat is on! That is the only reason.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext