SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chip Anderson who wrote (4059)6/17/1998 11:29:00 AM
From: Piranha  Read Replies (1) of 16960
 
Piranha Ends "Quiet Period!"

<< "If anyone can get better info, I heard that an analyst lowered his numbers late yesterday. I can't find it anywhere. If it's Brecken, that wouldn't be a big deal since his numbers are absurdly high anyway. On the other hand his company is the buyer this morning, while Montgomery is a big seller." >>

Here's my take on this. According to info I just got from First Call, FahneStock initiated coverage yesterday with a BUY. As a result of this, some changes to the consensus occurred, which (if you don't have all the information) might cause it to LOOK as if someone lowered estimates.

FahneStock's estimates are:

2Q 0.53
3Q 0.50
4Q 0.51
FY 2.04

After FahneStock is factored in, the consensus changes like this:

2Q DOWN 0.01 from 0.54 to 0.53,
3Q UP 0.04 from 0.48 to 0.52,
4Q DOWN 0.01 from 0.56 to 0.55,
FY DOWN 0.01 from 2.10 to 2.09.

We now have four houses covering, all with BUY or STRONG BUY recommendations. Since the terminology the various houses use can inconsistent, the Consensus Recommendation is 1.3 which is up from 1.8. Lower is better, and 1.0 is the highest you can have.

FYI, First Call no longer even shows a trace of either Opco (Lenny Brecken) or Buckingham Research, both of which had TDFX as a HOLD. As far as I can tell, Brecken has disappeared from the 3D scene completely, as he no longer shows up in the TDDDF analyst recommenations either.

Addendum: After posting this and re-reading it, it seems the First Call numbers are a little out of whack. I think they put the wrong "previous mean" estimates in the report I pulled today. According to an older report the previous means were (as of 6/10):

2Q 0.53
3Q 0.52
4Q 0.56
FY 2.10


Piranha
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext