Though we are all currently a little testy, I think there are valid points made. However, those who wish to see the site improved would best serve their own interests by addressing the company. The criticisms that have been brought up here and to the company have illustrated for all of us that ProNet is paying attention, and apparently attempting to correct some of the problems they have.
I do have questions and am a little disheartened by this latest release concerning the shareholder selling on May 20th. The high share price for the day was $4. Quite a tidy profit for the seller, and no doubt he didn't think it would go higher. Now perhaps he poured this right back into the company, but I have my doubts. And though I hate to say it, TMEX alluded to this in a post at the time.
Now I will hang with this company if they are for real and trying to seriously make a go of it. Again, their associations tend to legitimize them, but I'm skeptical of every company I invest in of late. Glenn, it's only a month after opening the site, but some kind of numbers would sure help us here. It may be mute, as there may be little or no numbers to report, just because ProNet is in phase I and a start-up. |
