Well, don't you think we have Jon Tara to take care of those new investors? I mean he's self-proclaimed savior.
In my opinion, your intuition and very competent research abilities were needed to build a case for Zulu, not destroy it. In balance, I think you could have been very helpful for the folks who got kicked around by Wired, Stock Detective, et. al. Your influence might have helped a lot of things, Aleta.
Look at it this way: If you've got a proponent and an opponent and someone supposedly is dangling in the middle, and you need to figure out which way to go, who are you going to look toward in order to get a hint as to which way to go?
Obviously, you get the hint from the influence in the middle. Call it math, call it behavior, call it what you want. It's the way it is.
So when I hear you tooting your horn as to how much money you've made playing Zulu (Keno and machine poker move over!), I'm thinking about all the folks who got taken to the cleaners. And when I hear comments like what you made this morning, again criticizing Zulu for not delivering something that it used to deliver, but got slammed in the past for doing so, I'm going to call you on it.
In effect, were you like: Why can't Zulu do this?
Zulu did do that, and you and others threw mudpies at 'em!
So when the company shifts gears and concentrates on getting its executive house in order (and that wasn't easy, was it?), and the press releases begin flowing accordingly, you can't cry that they should be doing something else, particularly something that they tried before that no one would accept. There's a contradiction here, and I challenged it. I still do. That we've strayed into this is your failure to accept my criticism.
You claim to defend new and innocent people considering Zulu as an investment, but your comments (i.e., your hints) have historically left many, many innocent people wailing in lifeboats. I'm sorry to use such a stark reality, but what I'm saying is true. Such is life in the middle. My side ain't so rosy either. |
