International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (597)	11/27/1996 6:52:00 AM
From: Mr Logic	of 35569

To all, are things getting a little out of hand here? I hold a reasonable amount of this stock and for that reason I am as interested (if not more interested) in negative views as positive views. I ignore what I regard as positive hype and unfounded positive statements, trying to extract real information from these positive postings. I do exactly the same with negative postings. Equally in the 11 years using email I have seen and written so many comments where the intention and interpretation are so different. That's why we have all this <g> stuff. If I say 'please can you state the facts to back that up' or 'assuming Lee Furlong is telling the truth' or 'there is no evidence for...' etc. I'm not being hostile. It would be a loss to all of us to lose contributors (except perhaps 'J Gordon Rothschild' (whose real name is...?) where they contribute. Either positively or negatively. I look forward to discussion continuing above the personal level. Waiting for the BD report...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next