Now there's a relevant question this morning. I hope so. And I hope that if it is, they revise it to make some of the information a little more accurate. Not just the ticker and the "San Jose based." Not to sound ungrateful, but the article reads a little bit like the author based it entirely on the press releases of the past few months. Makes it sound like the only way you can get the meter on a computer is through an I/O device, when in fact it's only in the past month that this has even become a possibility. I think it's important for people to understand that the WaveMeter exists as its own free-standing chip as well as now being integratable into other chips. Also, no mention of encryption or of why the hardware solution itself is so important. If I read the article without knowing anything about the company, I suspect I'd be a little bit confused as to why this is THE solution. I'd be interested for sure (that 1 billion dollar market cap comment really gets your attention...what does that work out to, like a 30$ share price?), but I don't feel that the article as a whole really conveys a full sense of how the systems works and why it will be so attractive and inevitable in the near future.
Anyway, like I say, I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining. I think it's great to get positive coverage like this. I think it will get more people looking in our direction, investigating what WAVX does and once that happens they'll start putting their money down. If the article appears in print, all the better. |
