SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : HMT TECHNOLOGY - UNDISCOVERED YET!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zakrosian who wrote (2011)6/18/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: Bill Lin  Read Replies (1) of 2253
 
Here is my fear:
HMTT has worked hard to get the 2.1 and 2.8 programs up and running. By going forward with the 3.4 and higher stuff, they are cannabilizing their older products.

I guess the qualification cycle is about 3 months. So, with inventory problems still in the industry, pricing pressure is still really bad and not improving.

By going to the 3.4, a 9 gig drive just got 1.5 platters (plus heads = about $30) cheaper than a 2.1 based drive. So manufacturers have incentive to move to higher density stuff continually.

but with the inventory glut (yeah, some say its lessening, but I don't see it yet), there may be a TEMPORARY but severe correction at HMTT's expense this coming quarter as their customers STOP ordering more costly drive components and move to qualifying the cheaper stuff.

Herb Greenberg's WDC comment (affect upon HMTT revenues) sounds accurate.

AS the Tech leader in platters, HMTT is doing great. But you are only as good as your production equipment. Intel is leading because it has economy of scale and productivity way beyond its competitors (except IBM).

I fear we maybe reaching IVAC production limitations? All I've heard of density is 3.4 gig limit. Maybe there is more to be squeezed?

Anybody know?

I heard of the 7.2 GMR product, but don't know the details.

So, anyway, I'd expect HMTT to be weak in the next month or so, until the conference call, and maybe 1 month after. Still think its an 18 month triple from here, but risk to downside of $8 is higher today than 2 weeks ago.

BL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext