I'll be happy to talk about prior art (and I share some of your concerns, see my earlier posts). But first lets finish with claim interpretation. Right now all the judge is considering is claim interpretation.
Your previous post said you could not understand how the patent could be interpreted in favor of GIFT. I made a few specific points, do you have any response to those points?
Are you satisfied there is some possibility (significant in view of potential damages) that GIFT could prevail on claim interpretation?
You said I was just waiting for suckers. Now, as in the past, I have said I will sell on a run-up. In the past I did sell on run-ups, and will do so again. In fact, I have been criticized on this thread for selling too soon. Given my openness about selling, I hardly think you can say I'm waiting for suckers. I simply place a value on the stock, and buy below, and sell above.
Do you agree that if the judge reverses herself and interprets the claims the way GIFT wants, the price will rise dramatically? If not, why not? Look at what has happened in the past on much less news.
GRC |
