SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks
NN 12.64+3.3%Nov 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: micromike who wrote (5252)6/20/1998 1:29:00 AM
From: pat mudge  Read Replies (1) of 18016
 
Ericsson's not the only one kicking tires.

<<<
SATURDAY JUNE 20 1998ÿÿTelecomsÿ
BT and AT&T discussions inconclusive
By Alan Cane

British Telecommunications, the UK's dominant operator, and AT&T, the largest US long-distance carrier, have held discussions, but they have been neither exclusive nor conclusive.

Yesterday neither company would comment on reports in a US magazine that they were close to forming a joint venture involving their international assets. Both pointed out, however, that they had made no secret of the fact that they were talking to a broad range of possible alliance partners.

In other words, it would be more remarkable if they had not had discussions than if they had. But that did not mean a deal was imminent.

BT insiders say, however, that a US deal can be expected within weeks of the consummation of the merger between the US companies WorldCom and MCI. BT holds a 20 per cent stake in MCI which precludes it, on anti-trust grounds, from concluding another US deal. It will receive some $7bn (œ4.2bn) from WorldCom for its MCI stake when the merger, held up by regulatory difficulties, is complete.

Both AT&T and BT have to rebuild their international strategies. The aim is to cream off lucrative international revenues from multinational customers demanding "seamless" global services. No single carrier or strategic alliance is capable at present of providing such a service.

AT&T's international strategy is based on WorldPartners, a company in which it holds the majority stake alongside KDD of Japan, Unisource of Europe, and Singapore Telecom. This week Telstra, the Australian carrier, agreed to take a 10 per cent stake.

WorldPartners is the core of a loose assemblage of smaller operators which distribute the company's services on their own territories. Michael Armstrong, AT&T's new chief executive, is known to want a stronger international structure.

BT's international vehicle is Concert, a joint venture with MCI, which has now been jeopardised by the US company's defection to WorldCom. BT has had a team in the US seeking possible alliances since WorldCom won the battle for MCI. AT&T could distribute Concert services in the US, but BT already has a post-merger distribution agreement with WorldCom, albeit one that will probably be short-lived. Moreover, AT&T is weak in local markets.

Possible alliance partners include the local carrier GTE, but it has few customers that do much business in Europe. A better bet would be Bell Atlantic, the regional US operator.

Both of these would have fewer obvious structural drawbacks than a tie-up with AT&T. Unless, that is, the two companies believe internet telephony and other innovations make it imperative that old enemies join forces to ward off the threat of the new challengers such as WorldCom, Colt, RSLCom and Mannesmann.

Lex>>>>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext