BAY Ntwks (under House) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: StockMan who wrote (6724)	6/21/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: drums	Read Replies (2) of 6980

Reading the Bosco-Stockman point/counterpoint reminded me of a couple of thoughts... 1) I find it interesting that this thread has gone from buying into the LU buying Bay rumors to now assuming that it was a crime that it didn't happen. It just might be possible that LU does not want to buy Bay (either now or in October) and knowing that, Bay did the next best thing...Shouldn't this at least be considered a possibility? 2) And, it is wrong to read anything more into these kind of shareholder lawsuits except that you can't please everybody all the time and people CAN sue. Unfortunately, in our society, if people can sue, they will find a reason to. I seem to recall that lawsuits have popped up at every major merger/acquisition over the past few years. just my $.02

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next