...contradictions highlight the hypocrisy of Connecticut's lawsuit against the tobacco industry...
The reason, why today's refusal by the Supreme Court, is important,
is that, a Attorney General of a particular state, DOES NOT
wish to risk his personal career, with a pointed statement
from the Supreme Court, ruling against the State with
commentary about "...contractions....and ...hypocrisy..."
State Attorney General's will think twice and thrice about the
wisdom of going against Consitutional violations.
This thread predicted that ...hypocrisy...and ...contradictions...
would eventually be revealed, NOT by the Congress, but by the
Federal Court.
This is news which , although has subtle implications, will
be the prevailing theme for the tobacco industry.
That is to say, on appeal to COURTS, the COURTS will rule and provide
the key ingredient for a favorable tobacco and (?other unpopular),
industries.
Philadelphia and Chicago wish to use the States suits against
tobacco, as models to go up against the firearms industry. I believe, that upon reflection, the AG's of States wishing to collect revenue, by suing manufacturers will re-evaluate there style of seeking
reparations.
WATCH THE COURTS,
particular, the appeal currently expected from the Federal Appelate
Court of Richmond, regarding FDA jurisdiction, and advertising.
dk |
