SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: janski who wrote (16769)6/23/1998 12:12:00 AM
From: Joe13579  Read Replies (2) of 29386
 
I wouldn't count Ancor out just yet. They have just recently assembled a fairly prestigious group of salespeople that need a little time to get up to speed (like I said before - I'm giving them until September to prove themselves), and after the last conference call I got the impression that Ancor has something up their sleeve. However, I would think that all this negative talk about Ancor as of late would result in some kind of a useless press release reaffirming their "world's fastest" product (or is it no longer the world's fastest???).

If Ancor has worthwhile patents on their technology, then it is also possible that they may be: 1) making efforts to license their technology; and/or 2) preparing to litigate in enforcing their patent rights. It would be nice to see a press release wherein Ancor would file a patent infringement suit against its competitors - I think the stock would skyrocket up to 40 again.

Craig S, or anyone that might be asking questions at the next conference call, it would be nice if you could ask the following questions:
1) Does Ancor have any patents on fibre channel switching technology? if yes, then
2) Has Ancor analyzed the switches of their competitors in regards to patent infringement? if yes, then
3) What are the results of the analysis and which companies are involved?

Rob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext