At a bottom now for gold? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : At a bottom now for gold?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ahda who wrote (1192)	6/23/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: Ray Hughes	Read Replies (1) of 1911

Hi Darleen, The big guys are richer than you and me. Rich means powerful and history shows that powerful people run their part of the world - not us peons. Banks are rich, that means powerful. I'm really impressed by reading the Indenture Britain signed with the Rothschilds to finance Wellingtons battles. I've read this (several times) in the gold trading room at Rothschilds, St. Swithens Lane, London. It gave the Rothschilds "virtual" control over Britain. Banks have a habit of getting their heads together - heard of Trilateral Commission or club of rome? - to run a bigger part of the world. Uh, collusion? No, just management for the best interests of the banks. A gold price rise vs the USD ain't in the best interests of the banks who like us to Trust In Fiat Money (their God). Darleen, its an old world order that is a central theme in European history. RH

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next