NewKidCo International (OTC:NKCIF) (TSE:NKC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NewKidCo International (OTC:NKCIF) (TSE:NKC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: esecurities(tm) who wrote (1846)	6/23/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: esecurities(tm)	Read Replies (1) of 4231

CLOSING BELL: 15/16.........The $100 million question. Why would the Lorenzen's (13D shareholders), Capital Funds, and SWEBF insiders (NASDAQ (and TSE) market maker(s), analysts, Lead IPO underwriters, SWEBF management and Board of Directors...) not simply have guaranteed [through nominal buying and volume representing an insignificant amount of their existing holdings]) a $US1.00 minimum BID for only ten (1) consecutive days prior to June 30 to protect their simply priceless...beyond priceless...NASDAQ NMS listing?...a fatally naive chess move blunder? or ??? as of today's close SWEBF has closed at $US1.00 or better 7/9 days...having now closed at 15/16 twice...SWEBFs NASDAQ NMS listing may now be contingent upon the Lernout arbitration ruling on Thursday? given SWEBF was trading above $US2.00/share Q3/4 '97 whose value fell precipitously pursuant and as proximate cause of Lernout Hauspie's Kurzweil Voice Recognition products contractual interference...accordingly, SWEBF should survive favorably a NASDAQ listing appeal [given a favorable Alpha v. LHSPF arbitration ruling]...in our opinion...good luck richard, selwyn, and steven and all shareholders...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next