GameTech Int'l. GMTC < SATELLITE Bingo and more > Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GameTech Int'l. GMTC < SATELLITE Bingo and more >

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sigmass who wrote (300)	6/24/1998 8:01:00 AM
From: sigmass	Read Replies (1) of 400

TO TGS AND SHAQ: Your statement that My analysis is incorrrect is an out right lie. I said that comparative 6 mos net income was down and it was. SEE THE 10 Q. What is all the extraneous B.S you cited got to do with my statement????? I said the the installed unit base was up in the second quarter by 103% and that the average revenue per unit of installed units was down 33%. SEE THE 10 Q. If I'm incorrect it's only because GMTC is publishing false information. In this case I do not believe they are. Therefore your statement of my analysis being incorrect is patently untrue. Since you know this all to well, it is obvious you lied. You purposely keep trying to cover negatives by citing positive facts that have no relation to the negative factor. That kind of thing has a name. In your infinite wisdom what would you call it????? I purposely saved the following for your analysis so you could give another irrelevent response to your followers. DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE - 2nd qtr comparison-- 98 vs 97 DOWN ALMOST 30 % --.08 vs .11 WHY DONT YOU TELL EVERYONE THAT THIS FIGURE IS USUSALLY THE ONE THAT TELLS WHERE A COMPANY IS REALLY AT and that it is a major factor in establishing market price and adjusting P/E ratios. You cannot claim to be ignorant of this and the many things that you so astutely and purposely ignore. Again I ask you ( and SHAQ) what do you call that????? Next posting will address the subject of what causes a drop in per unit revenues when when units installed jumps markedly but is not accompanied by a pro rata increase in per unit revenue which was markedly DOWN-- DOWN (33) %as I said before and which you said was incorrect. I mention this point because I feel certain that you are covering up on this subject like you do on so many. SHAQ you get more and more ridiculous. Go read the dictionary or get help from some one other than tgs.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next