SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI
CCSI 25.03-15.9%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter V who wrote (3500)6/24/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Quad Sevens  Read Replies (2) of 5736
 
Peter: It is obvious that Maisels is saying he does not feel qualified to give numbers for dollars, but that he does feel qualified in giving numbers for births and bilirubin tests. Based on these latter numbers, he feels entitled to say "This does not strike me as being an ''extremely limited'' market." As I pointed out, you do not be able to accurately estimate dollar figures to make such a statement. The PC-modem analogy proves my point; it does not prove yours.

You continue to be confused. You write

<< Wade, his response was to Asensio's assertions that CCSI had grossly overestimated potential market
size. Read the caption to the paragraph.>>

Peter: The caption is "'The potential market for all bilirubinometers is extremely limited....'' !! You supplied the caption, there it is in front of your face and then you twist it to read "his response was to Asensio's assertions that CCSI had grossly overestimated potential market". You go on:

<< You cannot escape the fact that he is
responding here to Asensio's assertion that CCSI overestimated the market. >>

LOL: Again, read the caption you supplied.

<< If you are saying that
Maisels never estimated market size then you have indeed proved my point: CCSI never responded
to Asensio's assertion that CCSI overestimated market size >>

I am indeed saying that, but that was my point, not yours. Your point was that Maisels estimated market size. He didn't, as I've made clear. And it is the opposite of what you said, so how can I be proving your point?

If you want to make the additional point that "CCSI never responded to Asensio's assertion that CCSI overestimated market size", then go ahead. I would agree with that. It is a good point. But it's not what we were talking about. You were saying there is a contradiction in Maisels statements, and there isn't. End of story.

Anyway, the stock will continue to be weak no matter how much a liar Asensio is.

Wade
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext