There are a few items that I think should be brought up at this time, for some serious discussion. These were brought to my attention by a very astute friend. I am long this issue, and only mean to collectively increase our understanding. Please no flaming.
1. In the most recent NR, it mentioned that the property where buildings were destroyed, were leased lands. I thought MDIN owned these lands. There is a very appreciable difference. Leased lands expire, and can be re-negotiated by others once expired.
2. MDIN has the first option only, on any of the properties settled in court, this in no way gaurantees they will be acquired by MDIN. As these properties are such key and strategic negotiating tool, should MDIN not acquire them, where do we stand.
3. The interpretation of the release, could be that MDIN cannot negotiate for the purchase or lease of said Araya/Olivos properties, until a ruling from a court. Could this not take quite some time.
4. There is a contradiction in two NR's regarding the state of the production mill. An earlier release states the mill was complete, but one after that states a pp to complete the mill, and start on Catan. Is the mill finished or not? Has Catan production started, or not?
5. Enami. Was not shipping to Enami to have begun already, in June.
6. Where are these shares coming from, every time we look, the issued seems to have crept up.
These are for constructive discussion only, Ancil, please refrain from slagging the company. KMT, any information you may be able to provide would be appreciated.
Regards, Hugh |
