NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!

NAMX 0.0001000

0.0%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (4014)	6/25/1998 9:23:00 AM
From: Hunter Vann	Read Replies (1) of 4736

The suit was dismissed on a technicality WRONG. The suit was dismissed because it had no merit. Simply speaking, the charges against Alice were not true. The Judge does not cite case law after case law simply based upon technicalities. The case against Alice Bryant and myself was not true and the judge ruled accordingly. I only believed I had a good investment and posted accordingly. We all know what you posted. Most of it was filled with BS hype. Frivolous share valuations, technical analysis bullcrap, and continous lies. Shame on you. lead the charge to bash this company . I lead the charge to prove Ebeling was a liar, a charge NAMX has proven to itself... Paul Ebeling hyping the stock on the first NAMX thread that was deleted. Ebeling had numerous different internet monikers on the TEIM thread, William Bowden, Robin Spataros, etc.etc..I apologized for making the assumption that you were indeed Paul Ebeling. An honest mistake on my part. What ever happened to Ngo Elizabeth? and now you want me to apologize to YOU!! WRONG. I don't want an apology from you. If you gave it, I certainly wouldn't accept it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next