BAY Ntwks (under House) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joel who wrote (6758)	6/25/1998 9:24:00 AM
From: otter	of 6980

re: "Does Lucent have anything that competes with the Bay products (wrt this deal)? I would think ATT might seek some Lucent replacement products if that is possible." I spoke today with a friend at Lucent not only in this context but also in the context of the TCI-AT&T deal. Here are factors. 1. Lucent does not have products that compete with Bay. Lucent, on the other hand, is an NT competitor. 2. AT&T is a large user of Bay equipment for its internal networks. 3. Bay sells cable modems and headend routers and other infrastructure to MSOs. Here are the questions: 1. Is Lucent willing to let NT through the Bay acquisition have a presence in the internal data networks at AT&T? 2. Is Lucent willing to let NT through the Bay acquisition have a presence in AT&T's MSO cable infrastructures that they will own? If I were running Lucent, it would grind my a....s to allow that to occur. If I were Lucent, the easiest way to shortcut that problem (which see as a major PR snafu) would be to buy Bay - if I could. If not, then I would buy NT - if I could. If not that, then I would buy..... and do everything I could to throw Bay/NT outta there. Comments? Thoughts?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next