SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13870)6/25/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: ShoppinTheNet  Read Replies (1) of 20681
 
I don't know what its like for you, but for me this whole SFA and the J&L discussion has been like watching Forest Gump play ping pong.

PJ states the following
"As a "black box" the J/L process is beyond the pale of consideration for serious investors in this post Bre-X climate. This has been mentioned by others contributing to this thread."

I am starting to think post Bre-x investors are getting pale on the SFA from Naxos as well. I strongly believe that Ledoux would not say any process was not SFA if it was not. Yet if it is so standard then we should be seeing results from the referee labs by now. We have not seen anything. Is the Naxos STF becoming a black box as well?

PJ may be giving us a hint on this issue when in his own words he states:

" The ore at Franklin Lake is like a combination lock that changes its combination to a new unknown number every time it's opened. This feature is producing inconsistent results."

So my question then is this. If the above statement is true is Ledoux using the same SFA procedure, the same flux, the same grind, and the same temp each time they release numbers?

"Notwithstanding my own seemingly optimistic postings of late regarding the asset we may have in the person of Jeremy Ison who brings needed experience to the table"

This is how a simple PR from Naxos gets built up to bigger proportions and months later we all accuse Naxos of touting this or that when we ourselves are the touts. We did it on J&L and we will do it again if we don't watch our selves. Now I have no problem with Jeremy Ison but let him do his job and not put the presser of having to be G_d on him.

"As we pursue the conventional path leading to wider recognition and
greater credibility the recovery issue is off the front burners. For
the time being we have other fish to fry as we drill and assay."

I like that credibility issue I would like to discuss how Naxos might enhance its credibility! Any one has any thoughts on this issue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News